Cisco Meraki MX64 vs MX67
The MX64 is an end-of-sale small-branch appliance; the MX67 is its direct replacement, roughly doubling firewall throughput and adding an integrated-LTE option (MX67C). For any small site still on an MX64, the MX67 is the recommended upgrade.
Cisco Meraki MX64
End-of-sale small-branch security and SD-WAN appliance for up to 50 devices.
- 250 Mbps stateful firewall throughput
- 5x GbE RJ45 (1 WAN, 4 LAN with 1 convertible)
- Cellular failover via 3rd-party USB modem only
- Past end-of-sale - capped at MX 18.1 firmware
Cisco Meraki MX67
Current small-branch security and SD-WAN appliance with an integrated-LTE option.
- Higher firewall throughput (450-700 Mbps class)
- 5x GbE RJ45 (1 WAN, 4 LAN with 1 convertible)
- Integrated CAT 6 LTE option on the MX67C variant
- Current platform with ongoing firmware support
Cisco Meraki MX64 vs Cisco Meraki MX67: spec comparison
| Spec | Cisco Meraki MX64 | Cisco Meraki MX67 |
|---|---|---|
| Stateful firewall throughput | 250 Mbps | 450 Mbps (up to 700 Mbps EMIX) |
| Advanced security throughput | 200 Mbps | 300-400 Mbps |
| Recommended max clients | 50 | 50 |
| WAN interfaces | 1x GbE RJ45 (+1 convertible) | 1x GbE RJ45 (+1 convertible) |
| LAN ports | 4x GbE RJ45 (1 convertible) | 4x GbE RJ45 (1 convertible) |
| Integrated cellular | No (3rd-party USB only) | Yes on MX67C (integrated LTE) |
| Wireless option | MX64W (802.11ac) | MX67W (802.11ac Wave 2) |
| PoE | No | No |
| Lifecycle status | End-of-sale (capped at MX 18.1) | Current / supported |
Choose Cisco Meraki MX64 if
Keep the MX64 only if it is deployed and meeting needs short-term; there is no new-purchase reason to pick it over the MX67.
Choose Cisco Meraki MX67 if
Choose the MX67 for any small-branch refresh: higher firewall throughput, the option of integrated LTE (MX67C), and a platform that stays on the current firmware track.
Verdict
Migrate to the MX67. The MX64 is end-of-sale and capped at MX 18.1, while the MX67 roughly doubles firewall throughput and adds an integrated-LTE model for cellular-first or failover branches. Keep the MX64 only as a short-term bridge.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Meraki MX64 end of life?
The MX64 is past end-of-sale and is capped at MX 18.1 firmware. Plan a migration to the MX67, which is the current small-branch model.
What is the replacement for the Meraki MX64?
The MX67 is the direct successor to the MX64 in Meraki's small-branch lineup, with higher throughput and an integrated-LTE option.
Does the MX67 have built-in cellular?
The base MX67 does not, but the MX67C variant includes an integrated LTE modem, so you do not need a 3rd-party USB modem for cellular uplink or failover.
How many users does the MX67 support?
Like the MX64, the MX67 is rated for small branches of up to 50 clients, but it handles that load at higher firewall and security throughput.
More Meraki MX comparisons
Specs are for planning and may change; Uniqcli confirms the current Cisco bill of materials and pricing on your quote. Cisco, Catalyst, Nexus, Meraki, and Firepower are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc.; Uniqcli LLC is an independent authorized Cisco partner.