Cisco Meraki MX100 vs MX95
The MX100 is an end-of-sale branch/campus appliance; the MX95 is its modern replacement, roughly tripling firewall throughput and adding 2.5G mGig and 10G SFP+ interfaces. For any organization still on an MX100, the MX95 is the recommended upgrade path.
Cisco Meraki MX100
End-of-sale mid-size branch/campus security and SD-WAN appliance for up to 500 users.
- 750 Mbps stateful firewall throughput
- 8x GbE RJ45 plus 2x 1G SFP interfaces
- Recommended for up to 500 clients
- Past end-of-sale - capped at MX 18.1 firmware
Cisco Meraki MX95
Current mid-to-large enterprise security and SD-WAN appliance with mGig and 10G SFP+ interfaces.
- 2 Gbps stateful firewall throughput (much higher than MX100)
- 2x 10G SFP+ and 2x 2.5G mGig interfaces
- Recommended for up to 500 clients
- Current platform with ongoing firmware and Advanced Security/SD-WAN Plus support
Cisco Meraki MX100 vs Cisco Meraki MX95: spec comparison
| Spec | Cisco Meraki MX100 | Cisco Meraki MX95 |
|---|---|---|
| Stateful firewall throughput | 750 Mbps | 2 Gbps |
| Advanced security throughput | 650 Mbps | ~1.5 Gbps |
| VPN throughput | 500 Mbps | Up to 2.5 Gbps (EMIX) |
| Recommended max clients | 500 | 500 |
| WAN interfaces | 2x GbE RJ45 | 2x 2.5G mGig + 2x 10G SFP+ (flexible WAN/LAN) |
| High-speed interfaces | 2x 1G SFP | 2x 10G SFP+, 2x 2.5G mGig |
| GbE RJ45 LAN ports | 8x GbE RJ45 | 4x 1GbE RJ45 |
| Cellular failover | USB 3G/4G modem | USB 3G/4G modem |
| Redundant power | Single internal PSU | Single internal PSU |
| Lifecycle status | End-of-sale (capped at MX 18.1) | Current / supported |
Choose Cisco Meraki MX100 if
Keep the MX100 only if it is already deployed and meeting your throughput needs short-term; there is no new-purchase reason to choose it over the MX95.
Choose Cisco Meraki MX95 if
Choose the MX95 for any refresh or new deployment: it roughly triples firewall throughput, adds 10G SFP+ and 2.5G mGig interfaces for higher-speed WAN/LAN, and remains on the current firmware track.
Verdict
Migrate to the MX95. The MX100 is end-of-sale and capped at MX 18.1 firmware, while the MX95 delivers about 2 Gbps firewall throughput, 10G SFP+ and 2.5G mGig interfaces, and ongoing support. Stay on the MX100 only as a short-term bridge until you can budget the cutover.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Meraki MX100 end of life?
The MX100 is past end-of-sale and is capped at MX 18.1 firmware, so it will not receive newer firmware features. Plan a migration to a current model such as the MX95 or MX105.
What is the replacement for the Meraki MX100?
Cisco positions the MX95 and MX105 as the modern replacements for the MX100, with the MX95 being the closest match for up-to-500-user sites.
How much faster is the MX95 than the MX100?
The MX95 offers roughly 2 Gbps stateful firewall throughput versus 750 Mbps on the MX100, plus higher advanced-security and VPN throughput and 10G interfaces.
Does the MX95 have 10G ports?
Yes. The MX95 includes two 10G SFP+ ports and two 2.5G mGig ports, which the MX100 did not offer (the MX100 used 1G SFP and GbE RJ45 only).
More Meraki MX comparisons
Specs are for planning and may change; Uniqcli confirms the current Cisco bill of materials and pricing on your quote. Cisco, Catalyst, Nexus, Meraki, and Firepower are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc.; Uniqcli LLC is an independent authorized Cisco partner.