Cisco Meraki MX95 vs MX105
The MX95 and MX105 share the same chassis and port layout, but the MX105 steps up performance: 3 Gbps stateful firewall and up to 750 users versus the MX95's 2 Gbps and 500 users. Choose the MX95 for medium branches; choose the MX105 for larger branches or sites that need more throughput headroom on the same 10G interfaces.
Meraki MX95
Cloud-managed SD-WAN security appliance for medium branches, up to 500 users, with 10G uplinks.
- 2 Gbps stateful firewall throughput
- Recommended for up to 500 users
- WAN: 2 x 10GbE SFP+ + 2 x 2.5GbE RJ45 (1 PoE+); LAN: 4 x 1GbE RJ45 + 2 x 10GbE SFP+
- Auto VPN, SD-WAN and full Meraki cloud management
Meraki MX105
Cloud-managed SD-WAN security appliance for larger branches, up to 750 users, with 10G uplinks.
- 3 Gbps stateful firewall throughput
- Recommended for up to 750 users
- WAN: 2 x 10GbE SFP+ + 2 x 2.5GbE RJ45 (1 PoE+); LAN: 4 x 1GbE RJ45 + 2 x 10GbE SFP+
- Up to 1000 concurrent site-to-site VPN tunnels
Meraki MX95 vs Meraki MX105: spec comparison
| Spec | Meraki MX95 | Meraki MX105 |
|---|---|---|
| Recommended users | Up to 500 | Up to 750 |
| Stateful firewall throughput | 2 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
| VPN throughput | 800 Mbps | Up to 1 Gbps |
| Concurrent site-to-site VPN tunnels | Up to 1000 | Up to 1000 |
| WAN interfaces | 2 x 10GbE SFP+ + 2 x 2.5GbE RJ45 (1 PoE+) | 2 x 10GbE SFP+ + 2 x 2.5GbE RJ45 (1 PoE+) |
| LAN interfaces | 4 x 1GbE RJ45 + 2 x 10GbE SFP+ | 4 x 1GbE RJ45 + 2 x 10GbE SFP+ |
| 10G uplinks | Yes (SFP+) | Yes (SFP+) |
| Management | Meraki cloud (dashboard) | Meraki cloud (dashboard) |
| SD-WAN / Auto VPN | Yes | Yes |
Choose Meraki MX95 if
Choose the MX95 for medium branches up to about 500 users where 2 Gbps of firewall throughput is plenty. It offers the same 10G interfaces and feature set as the MX105 at a lower price point.
Choose Meraki MX105 if
Choose the MX105 for larger branches up to about 750 users or sites that need extra throughput headroom (3 Gbps firewall, up to 1 Gbps VPN). The ports are identical to the MX95, so you are paying for capacity, not connectivity.
Verdict
The MX95 and MX105 are siblings with identical port layouts; the MX105 simply pushes higher performance: 3 Gbps firewall and up to 750 users versus 2 Gbps and 500. If your site fits comfortably under 500 users, the MX95 is the value choice; size up to the MX105 when you need the extra headroom for growth or heavier security inspection. Both are fully Meraki dashboard-managed.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the Meraki MX95 and MX105?
Both share the same ports, but the MX105 delivers 3 Gbps firewall throughput and supports up to 750 users, while the MX95 delivers 2 Gbps and up to 500 users. The MX105 is the higher-capacity model.
Do the MX95 and MX105 have the same ports?
Yes. Both offer 2 x 10GbE SFP+ plus 2 x 2.5GbE RJ45 WAN ports and 4 x 1GbE RJ45 plus 2 x 10GbE SFP+ LAN ports. The difference is throughput and user capacity, not connectivity.
How many users do the MX95 and MX105 support?
Meraki recommends the MX95 for up to 500 users and the MX105 for up to 750 users, with actual sizing depending on enabled security services and traffic.
Is the MX105 worth it over the MX95?
If your branch is growing past 500 users or needs more firewall and VPN headroom, the MX105 is worth it. For sites comfortably under 500 users, the MX95 gives the same ports and features for less.
More Security comparisons
Specs are for planning and may change; Uniqcli confirms the current Cisco bill of materials and pricing on your quote. Cisco, Catalyst, Nexus, Meraki, and Firepower are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc.; Uniqcli LLC is an independent authorized Cisco partner.