Cisco Firepower 1010 vs 2110
The Firepower 1010 is a desktop NGFW for small/home offices, while the 2110 is a 1RU appliance with about 2.5x the throughput, far higher session capacity, and more VPN peers for mid-size sites. Choose the 1010 for the smallest deployments and the 2110 when you need more performance, sessions, and scalability.
Cisco Firepower 1010
Desktop next-gen firewall for small and home offices with built-in switch ports and PoE.
- Desktop form factor, 8x GE RJ45 (2 with PoE)
- 890 Mbps FW+AVC, 880 Mbps threat throughput
- 100K concurrent sessions, up to 75 VPN peers
- Runs FTD or ASA; managed by FDM, FMC, or CDO
Cisco Firepower 2110
1RU next-gen firewall for mid-size enterprise edge with higher throughput and session scale.
- 1RU rack form factor, 12x GE RJ45 + 4x GE SFP
- 2.3 Gbps FW+AVC and threat throughput
- 1 million concurrent sessions, up to 1,500 VPN peers
- Runs FTD or ASA; managed by FDM, FMC, or CDO
Cisco Firepower 1010 vs Cisco Firepower 2110: spec comparison
| Spec | Cisco Firepower 1010 | Cisco Firepower 2110 |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | Desktop | 1RU rack-mount |
| FW + AVC throughput (1024B) | 890 Mbps | 2.3 Gbps |
| FW + AVC + IPS (threat) throughput | 880 Mbps | 2.3 Gbps |
| IPsec VPN throughput | 400 Mbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Max concurrent sessions (AVC) | 100K | 1 million |
| New connections/sec (AVC) | 6,000 | 18,000 (FTD) |
| Max VPN peers | 75 | 1,500 |
| Interfaces | 8x GE RJ45 (2 with PoE) | 12x GE RJ45 + 4x GE SFP |
| Network module slot | No | No (fixed; 2130/2140 have NM slot) |
| Software | FTD or ASA | FTD or ASA |
| Redundant power supply | No (external adapter) | No (single fixed PSU) |
Choose Cisco Firepower 1010 if
Choose the 1010 for home offices, teleworkers, and the smallest branches. Its desktop chassis, built-in switch ports, and PoE on two ports let it power a phone or AP without a separate switch, and its throughput suits small Internet links.
Choose Cisco Firepower 2110 if
Choose the 2110 for mid-size offices and enterprise-edge sites that need real headroom: about 2.5x the throughput, 10x the concurrent sessions, 1,500 VPN peers, and more interfaces including SFP uplinks in a rack-mount chassis.
Verdict
These appliances target very different site sizes. The 1010 is ideal for small and home offices thanks to its desktop design, integrated switching, and PoE. Step up to the 2110 when a site needs higher throughput, far greater session and VPN scale, or more interfaces. Both run the same FTD/ASA software, so policy and management carry over.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the Firepower 1010 and 2110?
The 2110 is a 1RU appliance with 2.3 Gbps throughput, 1 million sessions, and up to 1,500 VPN peers, while the 1010 is a desktop unit with 890 Mbps throughput, 100K sessions, and up to 75 VPN peers plus built-in switch ports and PoE.
Does the Firepower 2110 have redundant power?
No. The 2110 ships with a single fixed power supply that is not field-replaceable. For dual power-supply redundancy you need the 2130 or 2140.
Which is better for a remote-access VPN deployment?
The 2110 by a wide margin: it supports up to 1,500 VPN peers and 1.5 Gbps IPsec VPN throughput, versus 75 peers and 400 Mbps on the 1010. The 1010 is sized for a handful of remote users at a small site.
Should I buy the older 2100 Series or a newer Secure Firewall?
Check lifecycle status with your reseller. For new mid-size deployments, Cisco's current Secure Firewall 1140 or 3100 Series may be a better long-term investment than the older 2100 Series, while the 1010 remains a current small-office option.
More Security comparisons
Specs are for planning and may change; Uniqcli confirms the current Cisco bill of materials and pricing on your quote. Cisco, Catalyst, Nexus, Meraki, and Firepower are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc.; Uniqcli LLC is an independent authorized Cisco partner.